Minnesota Intoxilyzer Source Code Lawyers

When determining that an individual is intoxicated at the time of their DWI arrest, a machine called an Intoxilyzer is used. This machine is a very important part of Minnesota DWI convictions and DWI convictions all around the country.

In May, the Minnesota Supreme Court in the case the State v. Underdahl and Brunner, it was stated that the state of Minnesota must produce the source code to the Intoxilyzer 5000 EN if a charged individual can show that the code relates to their innocence or guilt in a DWI case. The defendants, Underdahl and Brunner sought out discovery of the source code after being charged with DWI.

In both of these cases, the state of Minnesota was ordered to produce the source code within one month or the breath tests that were conducted at the time of the DWI arrests would not be admissible into the court and the charges would be dismissed. This benefitted the Brunner case in that it was argued that it is important that source codes are revealed in order to show any defects in the machine.

Intoxilyzer Source Code Defense

In the case of Brunner, source code definitions were submitted and it was through the written testimony by a computer science professor that stated issues surrounding those source codes. It is very possible for the source code to reveal deficiencies that could cause individuals to heavily question the results of the Intoxilyzer. This enabled Brunner to use the defense that these possible deficiencies could relate to guilt or innocence. If the machine was wrong, then it is possible that Brunner’s blood alcohol content was over the legal limit further or actually under it. When a machine is defective, it is difficult to tell which would be accurate, making the evidence not strong enough for the charges to stand.

Being that the validity of the Intoxilyzer is being challenged all over the country, breath tests may be a thing of the past. With the source code being heavily questioned and the possibility that there may be defects, many individuals may be falsely charged.

If you have been given a breath test via an Intoxilyzer and your blood alcohol content was over .08, you need to contact a Minnesota DWI lawyer as soon as possible. You need to know your rights and you need to have the right guidance through your case in order to receive the best possible outcome. Perhaps you feel you have been falsely accused or that the possible penalties are unfair. Whatever the case, you do have access to an experienced DWI attorney.

Be aware that the court will not let you just have the source code. You have to prove you will pay to have it analyzed by experts, in Kentucky, at great expense. Mr. Ring belongs to a coalition that is doing this for you. Very few lawyers in the State can tell their clients they may benefit from this, but with our firm, you are already on board.

Twin Cities DWI Lawyers & Defense Attorneys

If you or someone you know has been arrested with a DWI charge, it is important to speak to a skilled DWI defense lawyer who can handle your situation with the utmost experience and dedication. Our DWI attorneys will thoroughly investigate your case and handle all court appearances to guide you through the criminal justice system. Protect your rights. If you have questions regarding your DWI charges contact our attorneys for a free consultation at (952) 797-7464.

Our Minnesota DWI defense lawyers represent clients throughout Hennepin County, Ramsey County, Anoka County, Scott County, Washington County, Sherburne County, and beyond. We represent clients throughout the Twin Cities including Minneapolis, St Paul, Anoka, Andover, Blaine, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Burnsville, Bloomington, Coon Rapids, Champlin, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maplegrove, Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Richfield, Roseville, White Bear Lake and Woodbury.

The Interchange Tower  |  600 South Hwy 169  |  St. Louis Park, MN 55426  |  952-797-7464

Minnesota DWI Attorney | DWI Minnesota | Minneapolis DWI | Minnesota DWI Laws | Resources